Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Host your website locally

Is it better to host your website with someone locally even if they are a bit higher priced? What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this?
Internationally, it's not essential that a UK website is hosted in the UK, or a US one in the states, and so forth.
If you're talking counties and the like, then no, I can't see any reason to choose one over the other (beside price and features)
I see no advantages at all, especially if a host offers a toll free phone. I see no use in the vicinity to your host's office, quality of their service is something that could be more valuable.
The quality of the hosting company - that is the main thing not location.
Choosing between a local and non-local host I would consider the following points:
1. Servers location.
2. Office location.
3. Seo apsects
I have a UK based domain and using the USA-based host cpwebhosting.net and never feel sorry for it.
I have read search engines do use a server's location to filter their results, depending on the location of the search. So 'UK' sites in Google, for example, may be affected by sites actually hosted in the UK.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured on Text Engineer

How to Select A Web Hosting Provider?

Most of us face difficulty choosing when we have too many options. Well, talking about IDEAL, do you believe there is IDEAL web host...